Multiple Comparisons: Bonferroni Corrections and False Discovery Rates

ثبت نشده
چکیده

Statistical analysis of a data set typically involves testing not just a single hypothesis, but rather many (often very many!). For any particular test, we may assign a pre-set probability α of a type-1 error (i.e., a false positive, rejecting the null hypothesis when in fact it is true). The problem is that using a (say) value of α = 0.05 means that roughly one out of every twenty such tests will show a false positive (rejecting the null hypothesis when in fact it is true). Thus, if our experiment involves performing 100 tests, we expect 5 to be declared as significant if we use a value ofα = 0.05 for each. This is the problem of multiple comparisons, in that we would like to control the false positive rate not just for any single test but also for the entire collection (or family) of tests that makes up our experiment.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

False discovery rate control is a recommended alternative to Bonferroni-type adjustments in health studies.

OBJECTIVES Procedures for controlling the false positive rate when performing many hypothesis tests are commonplace in health and medical studies. Such procedures, most notably the Bonferroni adjustment, suffer from the problem that error rate control cannot be localized to individual tests, and that these procedures do not distinguish between exploratory and/or data-driven testing vs. hypothes...

متن کامل

The problem of multiple testing and its solutions for genom-wide studies

The problem of multiple testing and its solutions for genome-wide studies. Even if there is no real change, the traditional p = 0.05 can cause 5% of the investigated tests being reported significant. Multiple testing corrections have been developed to solve this problem. Here the authors describe the one-step (Bonferroni), multi-step (step-down and step-up) and graphical methods. However, somet...

متن کامل

Controlling Error in Multiple Comparisons, with Examples from State-to-State Differences in Educational Achievement

Three alternative procedures to adjust significance levels for multiplicity are the traditional Bonferroni technique, a sequential Bonferroni technique developed by Hochberg (1988), and a sequential approach for controlling the false discovery rate proposed by Benjamini and Hochberg (1995). These procedures are illustrated and compared using examples from the National Assessment of Educational ...

متن کامل

False positive rates in standard analyses of eye movements in reading

Abstract: In research on eye movements in reading, it is common to analyze a number of canonical dependent measures in order to study how the effects of a manipulation unfold over time. Although this gives rise to the well-known multiple comparisons problem, i.e. an inflated probability that the null hypothesis is incorrectly rejected (Type I error), it is accepted standard practice not to appl...

متن کامل

False Discovery and False Nondiscovery Rates in Single - Step Multiple Testing Procedures

Results on the false discovery rate (FDR) and the false nondiscovery rate (FNR) are developed for single-step multiple testing procedures. In addition to verifying desirable properties of FDR and FNR as measures of error rates, these results extend previously known results, providing further insights, particularly under dependence, into the notions of FDR and FNR and related measures. First, co...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2004